Wednesday, 9 April 2025

The war to end all wars

The war to end all wars


For many years I have been captivated by the events of the First World War and the profound loss of life associated with it on all sides.  

Approximately 886,000 British soldiers lost their lives during the First World War. This figure includes members of the British Army, Royal Navy, and Royal Flying Corps.

This figure reflects the devastating human cost of the conflict, which lasted from 1914 to 1918. The British Expeditionary Force and subsequent volunteer/conscript armies faced significant losses in major battles like the Somme and Passchendaele.

The "iron harvest.

"The Battle of the Somme (1916) alone saw 57,470 British casualties on the first day, including 19,240 fatalities. 

It is estimated that about 750,000 British soldiers died during the conflict, and a significant portion of them was never recovered or identified. In recent years, particularly in 2024 and 2025, the remains of British soldiers from World War I have been unearthed, frequently as a result of construction or agricultural activities. Some of these soldiers have been identified and afforded military burials, while others continue to be designated as "Unknown Soldiers," as reported by BBC News. Two unidentified Scottish soldiers who lost their lives in World War One have been interred in France (2024) following the discovery of their remains during the construction of a hospital. War detectives from the Ministry of Defence (MoD) were summoned to assist in identifying the two men, believed to have perished during the Battle of Loos in 1915.

The remains of soldiers from the First World War continue to be discovered on farmland and former battlefields to this day, particularly in regions like France and Belgium where some of the most intense fighting occurred. This phenomenon is often referred to as the "iron harvest."

Public perception shifted

As World War I progressed and casualties mounted, public perception shifted dramatically from initial patriotic fervor to widespread disillusionment and anti-war sentiment. This transformation was driven by the scale of losses, media coverage, and societal impacts.

Early in the war, governments tightly controlled information to maintain morale. British media downplayed setbacks and emphasized patriotism, with censors omitting details of military blunders and casualties. For example, the disastrous first day of the Battle of the Somme was initially reported with vague or optimistic framing.

By 1917, soldiers’ letters and returning veterans exposed the grim reality, undermining earlier propaganda. The Central Sikh League and other groups mobilized against colonial policies, reflecting broader discontent.

The war’s end in 1918 left societies grappling with loss and questioning traditional authority. In Britain, veterans and civilians alike criticised leadership, paving the way for political changes like Labour’s rise and demands for social equity.

German casualties

Approximately 2 million German soldiers perished during World War I, though exact figures vary due to incomplete records and differing methodologies. 

German soldiers in World War I endured a harrowing transformation from patriotic enthusiasm to profound disillusionment, shaped by brutal combat, authoritarian military structures, and societal upheaval.

Many German soldiers initially joined the war with nationalist fervor, influenced by pre-war militarism that glorified service and obedience.

Conscription laws ensured mass mobilization, with soldiers subjected to strict discipline and hierarchical control, including physical punishments for insubordination.

By 1918, starvation from the Allied blockade, exhaustion, and awareness of the home front’s disintegration eroded soldiers’ resolve. The sudden armistice in November 1918 shocked troops who had been told victory was imminent, fueling the “stab-in-the-back” myth that blamed civilians and politicians for betrayal.

Despite the armistice, 2,738 German soldiers died on the war’s last day, including Lieutenant Tomas, the last known German casualty

In summary, German soldiers’ experiences reflected the collision of rigid militarism, industrialized warfare, and the collapse of national myths, leaving a legacy of trauma and disillusionment that shaped inter-war Germany.

The First World War reshaped global politics

The First World War (1914–1918) reshaped global politics, economics, and society, leaving enduring lessons that influenced the 20th-century.

Human life is sacred and inviolable. War, which involves the intentional taking of lives, is morally indefensible.

Violence begets more violence. Ethical behaviour requires seeking peaceful solutions to conflicts, and yes, aligning with philosophies such as those of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.

The indiscriminate nature of modern warfare often results in civilian casualties and suffering, which some view as unacceptable collateral damage.

The importance of building societies based on mutual respect, understanding, and cooperation rather than conflict and domination is so Important.

Encouraging dialogue, education, and cultural exchange is essential for fostering a global culture of peace and understanding.

George Orwell made an observation regarding the physical stature of policemen after the First World War. In his essay "The Lion and the Unicorn: Socialism and the English Genius," Orwell noted that policemen seemed to be "noticeably smaller" than before the war. This comment was part of a broader critique of the societal changes and the decline of certain standards in post-war Britain.

When soldiers returned to Britain after the First World War, their expectations and experiences were shaped by a mix of hope, uncertainty, and the challenges of reintegration into civilian life. 

Many returning soldiers hoped to find stable employment and reintegrate into the workforce, leveraging skills they had acquired during their military service.

The transition was often difficult due to a post-war economic downturn. Unemployment was high, and many veterans struggled to find jobs, leading to disillusionment and frustration.

Soldiers anticipated recognition for their service and sacrifices, expecting gratitude and respect from the society they defended.

While there were initial expressions of gratitude, such as parades and memorials, the long-term support for veterans was often inadequate. Many felt forgotten or underappreciated, especially as economic hardships persisted.

Some soldiers sought understanding and support for the psychological trauma they experienced, known as "shell shock" at the time.  Mental health support was limited, and societal understanding of psychological trauma was minimal. Many veterans suffered in silence, facing stigma and a lack of effective treatment.

Some veterans expected their experiences to lead to social and political change, hoping for a more equitable society. The war did contribute to significant social changes, including shifts in class dynamics and the expansion of the electorate. However, progress was slow, and many veterans felt that their sacrifices did not translate into the societal reforms they had hoped for.

"Homes fit for heroes"

Lloyd George famously promised returning soldiers "homes fit for heroes," raising expectations for improved living conditions and housing after the war.

While some efforts were made to improve housing, progress was slow and insufficient to meet the demand. The housing shortage left many veterans and their families in inadequate conditions, leading to widespread disappointment.

Discontent contributed to social and political unrest, with veterans participating in strikes and protests demanding better conditions and treatment.

Discontent over pay and working conditions led to a police strike (1919) in London and Liverpool, highlighting unrest even among key state workers.

The 1926 General Strike: Though occurring a few years later, was partly rooted in post-war economic difficulties. It involved miners, transport workers, and other sectors, protesting wage reductions and poor working conditions.

In Germany The Spartacist Uprising (1919): Led by the Spartacist League, a Marxist revolutionary movement, this uprising sought to establish a socialist state. It was violently suppressed by the Weimar government.

When capitalists from various nations come into conflict and engage in warfare, it is typically not they who take up arms; rather, they enlist the working classes of their countries to fight on their behalf, in other words workers are used as canon foder.

Patriotism and jingoism

This situation necessitated an appeal to patriotism and jingoism, with politicians traveling across the nation to stoke fervor for the war. A notable figure in this endeavor was Horatio Bottomley, who styled himself as the People’s Tribune, despite being a discredited bankrupt prior to the conflict. In his quest to enlist recruits, he amassed £78,000, which he squandered on racehorses, women, and champagne. For young male workers of military age who resisted the compelling call to arms, young women were tasked with pinning white feathers on them as a symbol of cowardice.

The capitalist class was not content with their workers merely facing bullets and bombs on the battlefields; they also expressed dissatisfaction with the workers' output on the home front. In the UK, there was significant blame directed at munitions workers for the shortages of shells required for the war effort, with accusations that they were preoccupied with drinking in pubs. As a result, restrictions on pub hours were implemented, which remained in effect until the 1990s.

The phrase "The war to end all wars" stands as one of the most ironic statements in history. Rather than putting an end to conflicts, the First World War planted the seeds for future wars. The punitive measures imposed by the Versailles Peace Treaty fostered a deep sense of grievance in Germany, leading to the perception that the nation had been unfairly betrayed. This sentiment was skillfully exploited by German nationalists, including the Nazis, for their own agendas. Additionally, the heavy reparations imposed on Germany resulted in significant economic instability, exemplified by the hyperinflation of 1923, which created a fertile environment for aggressive nationalist movements like the Nazis to thrive. The growing animosity between the Western Powers and the Bolshevik regime foreshadowed the Cold War, which would come to dominate the twentieth century. Although the League of Nations was established with the intention of preventing further conflicts, it proved ineffective, as it failed to address the root cause - competition among capitalist powers for global markets and resources. Within the framework of capitalism, wars are ultimately inevitable.


Monday, 7 April 2025

Pensioner poverty


Pensioner poverty



A recent report by Age UK highlights that certain groups of pensioners continue to face significant challenges regarding the cost of living, with conditions deteriorating compared to the previous year.

The most adversely affected demographics include older individuals with disabilities, older renters, and those subsisting on low to modest incomes.

According to new research from Age UK, one in three pensioners (34%), representing approximately 4.1 million individuals, reported feeling less financially secure as they approach 2025 than they did at the start of 2024.

The overall financial situation has worsened for all pensioners, particularly among specific sub-groups such as older individuals with disabilities, older renters, and those with low to modest incomes. Additionally, other vulnerable groups include older women, individuals living alone, and older caregivers.

In a representative survey of individuals aged 66 and above, participants conveyed to Age UK that their concerns regarding the cost of living remain far from resolved.

The Charity's latest report expresses deep concern regarding the rising energy costs and the challenges faced by older individuals in affording essential items. This situation has been exacerbated by the withdrawal of the Winter Fuel Payment for many on low and modest incomes, including those with health issues.

Starting in April 2025, energy prices are projected to exceed 50% of their levels at the beginning of 2022. Although inflation has decreased to near pre-2022 levels, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) recorded at 3% in January 2025, the prices of everyday necessities, such as groceries, remain significantly elevated compared to previous years.

Amidst these financial strains, Age UK's research indicates that nearly three in five pensioners (59%), equating to 2.9 million individuals, have opted to reduce their heating or electricity usage. A significant number of these pensioners would prefer to forgo heating altogether rather than incur debt, a sentiment that rises to 65% among female pensioners. 

The harsh truth is that it is essential to focus on increasing our savings to prevent the possibility of retiring in financial hardship, a challenge that has become increasingly difficult in today’s economic climate.

Will society be incapable of providing future pensioners with a standard of living comparable to what they enjoy today? Is there a looming generational conflict between the working population and retirees regarding the distribution of national income between wages and pensions?

The succinct answer is: No. These narratives are largely alarmist tales propagated by employers aiming to lessen their contributions to company pension schemes, as well as by insurance companies seeking to increase sales of private pensions.

However, in contemporary capitalist society, there exists another group that does not work yet relies on the labour of others for their upkeep: individuals who derive income from what has traditionally been termed "unearned income." This category includes earnings from rents, interest, and dividends stemming from property ownership. This serves as a fundamental definition of a member of the capitalist class: someone who possesses enough profit-generating assets to sustain themselves without engaging in labour.


Age UK Report





Sunday, 6 April 2025

Young People Are Resisting

Young People Are Resisting

It’s ill-mannered to point a finger at someone we were taught. It’s more ill-mannered to use a pointing finger to con, persuade, influence and sway young men to sign up and fight capitalism’s conflicts for it.

Lord Kitchener, Secretary of War during World War One was featured on a propaganda poster pointing his finger and exhorting, (threatening?) those viewing it. Under his picture were the words ‘Wants You. Join your country’s army! God save the king.’ This appeal to patriotism, or stupidity, was considered an effective way of persuading British young men to voluntarily enlist. Based on this original, there were many other capitalist states who issued similar brainwashing images.

Young people today are often more informed and critical of the narratives presented to them.

This resistance often manifests in various ways, including protests, activism, and vocal opposition to policies they perceive as unjust or outdated.

So well done Youth Demand!

Youth Demand

Mike Martin, a veteran of the Afghanistan conflict and the Liberal Democrat Member of Parliament for Tunbridge Wells, issued a serious caution to the British public as Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine continues unabated.

Mike Martin advocates for the UK government to contemplate the reintroduction of conscription. He argues that the current geopolitical climate necessitates a robust defence strategy, which may involve mobilising a larger segment of the population to ensure national security.

I think young people today in this Modern Age are not as gullible as they once were, they are better educated to know better that's why there is so much talk of "Conscription" in the media, and from politicians Army generals.

Indeed, young people today are often more informed and critical of the narratives presented to them, thanks in large part to the accessibility of information through the internet and social media. This heightened awareness allows them to question authority, scrutinise motives, and engage in discussions about the implications of war, nationalism, and economic systems.

The conversation on the other hand from young people is around "construction" and reflects a desire for building a better future, focusing on peace, sustainability, and social justice rather than conflict. Many young individuals are drawn to movements that advocate for constructive solutions to global issues, such as climate change, inequality, and systemic injustice. They recognise the importance of collaboration over conflict and see the value in collective action to address these pressing challenges.

Furthermore, contemporary education emphasises critical thinking and media literacy, equipping young people with the tools to analyse and deconstruct propaganda and persuasive messaging. This shift in mindset represents a significant departure from previous generations who may have been more susceptible to simplistic appeals to patriotism or duty.

As a result, the discourse has evolved from one of blind allegiance to a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of global conflicts and the responsibilities of citizenship. Young people are increasingly advocating for dialogue, empathy, and innovative approaches to problem-solving, demonstrating that they are not just passive recipients of information but active participants in shaping the future.

The discussion around conscription today often reflects a broader awareness among young people about the implications of mandatory military service and the historical context surrounding it. Unlike previous generations, many young individuals are equipped with the knowledge and critical thinking skills necessary to evaluate the reasons behind calls for conscription, especially in the face of modern conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

This heightened awareness has led to debates about the ethics and necessity of conscription, as well as an understanding of its impact on personal freedoms and societal obligations. Young people are increasingly questioning the motivations behind such policies, exploring whether they serve national interests or merely perpetuate cycles of conflict and militarization.

Moreover, with the rise of social media and global connectivity, young people are able to share perspectives and experiences from around the world, fostering a more informed dialogue about the consequences of war and the value of alternative forms of service, such as community engagement or humanitarian work. This shift signifies a movement towards prioritising constructive solutions rather than military ones, reflecting a desire for peace and collaboration in addressing global challenges.

As discussions about conscription continue, young voices are advocating for a reconsideration of what citizenship and service mean in the modern age. This generation is increasingly focused on building bridges rather than walls or wars, emphasising the importance of diplomacy, dialogue, and understanding in a complex world.



Sunday, 16 June 2024

The General election July 4 2024




This General election is the most Boring ever! 

What's the point?


50 years ago, October 1974 was my very first General election.

 

And I was thinking...

How times and the parties have changed since then?  

Labour In particular has changed beyond my wildest imagination. From a warm Social Democratic Broadchurch that I remember, to what was and has become today under  Sir Keir Rodney (Plunker) Starmer, Conservative Mark 2 a party for Business.

These are bad and uncertain times in the world both at home and aboard, However, the Tories are going to be annihilated and consigned to the dustbin of history possibly (Fingers crossed) permanently?

Tory Britain is about to fall... But what follows could be far worse.

When Britain goes to the polls on 4 July, it is certain Keir Starmer’s Labour Party will surge to victory. A victory by default, the Tories after 14 long years are hated more than Labour is distrusted. 

Starmer has changed the Labour Party

Starmer has changed the Labour Party since taking over from Jeremy Corbyn, many say he has been ruthlessly purging the left, deselecting candidates from the left, Imposing candidates on constituency parties and much more.

Starmer has moved Labour towards the Liberal right of the old Conservative Party, and Labour could move further, more to the right once in office.  

Politics in general is moving to the right in Britain, In Europe, in the US.

I think new waters are flowing in all directions, a turning point in establishment politics is merging that could combine to change the politics of this country and around the world. 

The legacies of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan are still playing out before our very eyes all these years later. 

They both planted the seeds of the world’s move to the deep right politically. In Britain Thatcher, implemented sweeping reforms concerning the affairs of the economy, eventually including the privatisation of most nationalised industries, and the weakening of trade unions

Reaganomics and Thatcherism

The fact that British and US elected leaders within a year with strong anti-government, anti-Keynesian, and advocates of the private market sector and tax reductions was a remarkable coincidence.

Both President Reagan and Mrs. Thatcher had the distinction of getting their names linked to a special line of thinking. 

Both leaders attempted to shift the centre of the political spectrum sharply to the right in their policies.

Reagan set about undoing a half-century of legislation which had built up the public sector while opening up America to expansion led by the private sector. 

Mrs. Thatcher was occupied with doing the same thing in Britain. Both leaders believed that government itself was partly the cause of their mutual economic problems, including high inflation and slow economic growth. The answer they believed was less government. In contrast, all previous leaders since the 1930s had assumed that if things went wrong, the remedy would be government intervention.

Neoliberalism

The term neoliberalism has become more prevalent in recent decades A prominent factor in the rise of conservative and right-libertarian organizations, political parties, and think tanks, and predominantly advocated by them, neoliberalism is often associated with policies of economic liberalization, including privatization, deregulation, globalization, free trade, monetarism, austerity, and reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society.The neoliberal project is also focused on designing institutions and is political in character rather than only economic.

How does neoliberalism affect the poor?

Higher rates of poverty; less protection against poverty, unemployment, and healthcare risks; social exclusion. Austerity-driven financial policies leading to an increase in unemployment and poverty; reduced labour costs.

The origins of Neoliberalism lie in early 1920s, in the works of Austrian economist and sociologist Ludwig von Mises, as a response to the powerful organizations of German and Austrian workers (Misses, 1981 , 1983 , 2005). It represented a means of justifying the concentration of capital, the subordination of the state to the market and an anti-socialist system of social control. Mises became an economic advisor to the Austrofascist dictator Engelbert Dollfuss. He argued for corporate tax cuts, balanced budgets, wage cuts and the repression of trade unions. He believed that Mussolini’s seizure of power had “saved European civilisation. The merit that Fascism has thereby won for itself will live on eternally in history”. Moreover that “the capitalistic market economy is a democracy, in which every penny constitutes a vote”. Elected by means of what he called a “consumer plebiscite”, the rich depended on the “will of the people as consumers”

The Conservative Party learnt a very salutary lesson in 1972 when five shop stewards in the London docks were imprisoned for breaching a court order. This lead to massive unofficial strike action and the, normally moderate, Trades Union Congress (TUC) called a one-day general strike. The government climbed down and found a legal excuse to release the so-called “Pentonville 5”. Thereafter, the basic principle of British anti-trade union law has been to avoid direct penalties on workers, but rather to threaten the funds of trade unions that do not obey the law to the letter. This drives the trade union bureaucracy to protect its assets by making sure that their members only engage in lawful industrial action.

Neoliberal politicians make a big play of their opposition to regulations.


However, they are quietly in favour of the maximum regulation of trade unions,

particularly restricting their right to strike.

Successive governments have imposed increasingly draconian restrictions on the normal functioning of trade unions, in particular making it increasingly difficult to hold a legal strike. Currently, not only must a postal ballot be held, but ballots have to achieve at least a 50% turnout of eligible union members, with a majority voting in favour of strike action. In important public services – including in the health, education and transport sectors – an additional threshold of 40% in favour of industrial action from all eligible members must be met for the action to be legal. A Government website said: “Tougher ballot thresholds will reduce industrial action in important public services like transport, health and education by 35%, and 1.5 million working hours a year will be saved from strike action. These measures will provide a £100 million boost to UK economy over 10 years”.

A split in the Conservative Party between its pro- and anti-EU wings finally forced Thatcher out of office and, indirectly gave birth to Ukip (United Kingdom Independence Party) in 1991, a virulently right-wing, racist, anti-European party, led by Nigel Farage. Farage confirmed his neoliberal credentials when the 1997 Ukip manifesto said “Regulations destroy jobs and the Ukip is determined to reduce the regulatory burden on industry and on small businesses in particular” ( United Kingdom Independence Party, 1997 ). Since then Farage has used Ukip, and latterly the Brexit Party, to pull the Conservative Party to the neoliberal right by threatening to attract their voters.

In 2012, a group of Conservative Members of Parliament published a book entitled Britannia Unchained that argued that that the UK has a “bloated state, high taxes and excessive regulation”. It continues: “The British are among the worst idlers in the world. We work among the lowest hours, we retire early and our productivity is poor”.